Home
In This Issue.....
February, 2005
President's Message
Paralegals and Family Law
Discovery
Take This Job and Morph It!
Past Issues.....
December, 2004
September, 2004
June, 2004
March, 2004
December, 2003
September, 2003
June, 2003
March, 2003
December, 2002
September, 2002
June, 2002
March, 2002
June, 2001
September, 2001
December, 2001
|
|
POINTS
and AUTHORITIES |
|
Issue XVI
February 2005 |
|
Paralegals and Family Law
Discovery
Paralegals may often be asked to assist the
attorney in drafting and answering Interrogatories. The following article
will give you the nuts and bolts of how this mechanism of discovery works.
Perhaps one of the most important discovery
mechanisms in family law is the use of Interrogatories. Interrogatories are
written questions which must be answered in writing under oath.
Interrogatories should be drafted to give the interrogator fodder for the
questions that will be asked in deposition. The Interrogatories give the
framework for the deeper exploration of issues that depositions provide.
Remember that every jurisdiction has
specific rules on how many questions may be asked and how the answers must
be provided. In DC, you are permitted to ask 40 questions. It is best to
start with 30 and keep 10 in reserve as supplemental, in case you need them
later. You may serve Production of Documents requests with your
Interrogatories and generally, unlike Interrogatories, there is no limit on
the amount of requests for documents you may make. Make your Production of
Documents requests mirror the Interrogatory questions.
DC and MD, litigants do not file written
discovery with the Court. Serve the discovery on the party by certified mail
and file a Certificate Regarding Discovery with the clerk.
You may respond to defendant’s refusal to
answer discovery with a Motion to Compel Discovery. You will find the
particulars is DC Dom. Rel. Rule 37. Remember that before filing that motion
to compel, that the party filing the motion must certify that they made a
good faith effort to resolve the issue with opposing counsel prior to asking
that the court take action. In some cases, the court may award sanctions for
discovery infractions. The sanctions may run the ganut, from financial (fees
and costs) to contempt of court. If the opposing party prevails, they may
get a full or partial protective order. Keep in mind that sanctions are
imposed according to what the judge finds is just.
If a party is served with discovery and the
party finds there is a need to refrain from answering a particular question,
the party may object. One of the most common objections to an Interrogatory
question goes like this:
OBJECTION. Interrogatory seeks information
not relevant to this matter, information not reasonably calculated to lead
to the discovery of admissible evidence, and information protected by
physician-patient confidentiality.
There are other rules for objections, and
you will find then in Dom Rel 33, which states how to object and Dom Rel &
26, which covers the scope of discovery. A party may object to an
Interrogatory that is unduly burdensome.
*George "G" Petersen is a graduate of the
PJA School Paralegal Program, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, where he earned his
Certificate in Paralegal Studies in 1995. "G's" years of prior experience in
the medical field as a hospital technician, and as an Emergency Medical
Services worker, are a valuable asset to his knowledge in medical
malpractice and personal injury practice areas. From 1995-2001, he served as
a paralegal, investigator, information technology specialist, and computer
network administrator for the prestigious Washington DC law firm of Spirer &
Goldberg, P.C., prior to embarking on his career as an independent paralegal
(visit George's
web site).
|
|